Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  8 / 80 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 80 Next Page
Page Background

8

MAY 2015

|

THE FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL

LETTER FROM THE EDITOR

Security and Engagement

BY SHAWN DORMAN

T

Shawn Dorman is the editor of

The Foreign Service Journal.

risk option other than closing up shop

altogether, so the efforts of security and

diplomatic professionals alike

must be on finding the best

way to support engagement

while minimizing and mitigat-

ing risk. What level of risk is

tolerable? How is that deter-

mined? When and where do the

lines change?

In “Effective Diplomacy after Benghazi,” FSO Michael Dod-

man, consul general in Karachi from 2012

to 2014 and winner of the first Ryan C.

Crocker Award for Outstanding Leader-

ship in Expeditionary Diplomacy, offers

his take on how to conduct effective

diplomacy in a high-threat environment.

In “Diplomatic Security Triage in a Dangerous World,” Ambassador Antho

ny

Quainton, who has served as assistant

secretary for diplomatic security, evalu-

ates where security priorities fall today

and how much has changed since the

Inman Commission recommendations

were made 30 years ago in the wake of

the 1983 Beirut bombings. He points

to responses at other critical moments,

following the 1998 East Africa embassy

bombings; Sept. 11, 2001; and Benghazi,

Sept. 11, 2012.

Finally, in “Keeping Embassy Security in Perspective,” veteran FSO James

Bullock takes a critical look at risk toler-

ance—or the lack thereof. He argues that

FS personnel “sometimes find ourselves

in harm’s way because that is the only

way we can do our jobs. Our objectives

do not become less

compelling just

because some dan-

ger is involved.”

In our cover story, “Build- ing a Foreign Service for 2025 and Beyond,” Director Gener

al

Arnold Chacón and Senior Advi-

sor Alex Karagiannis offer an overview of

the challenges facing the Foreign Service

and the Bureau of Human Resources’

goal: to recruit, retain and sustain a

diverse workforce.

On a related note, in “Tips from the Belly of the Python,” FSO John Fer offer

s

suggestions for how to optimize profes-

sional development and strengthen the

Foreign Service while negotiating a chal-

lenging mid-level passage.

Speaking of challenges facing the

Foreign Service, please see AFSA News

for coverage of the American Academy of Diplomacy’s new report, “Diplomacy at Risk,” which was released as we went

to press. The full document is available

at academyofdiplomacy.org, and is well

worth reading.

We will feature a more in-depth look

at the study in our July-August focus on

diplomacy as a profession. In the mean-

time, we look forward to hearing your

thoughts on the report and its recom-

mendations. Please write to journal@

afsa.org with subject line “AAD Report.”

And please, remember to vote in the

AFSA election before June 4.

n

he

April focus on Vietnam

was, we are almost certain,

the largest

FSJ

focus in 90

years, and included a first- ever FSJ online supplement. In my

introduction, I quoted from the June

1975

FSJ

editorial calling for a post-mor-

tem of the Vietnam era from the career

Foreign Service and noted that there is

little evidence such an assessment was

undertaken.

Then we heard from retired Ambassa-

dor David Lambertson, who reported that,

actually, such an evaluation

was

done in

1975 at the request of the White House,

and the resulting memo—“Lessons of

Viet-Nam”—brought together the views of

dozens of FSOs. He was the drafter.

However, that document apparently

died on Secretary of State Henry Kiss-

inger’s desk, and instead quite a different

memo went forward to the White House.

Wouldn’t it be fascinating to see both ver-

sions? Look for them in the July-August

Journal

.

This month, we consider an issue that

is on everyone’s mind today but is also

evergreen, as shown by these covers from

past years of the

FSJ

: managing risk. The

critical question of how to do diplomacy

and development in a dangerous world—

the tension between protection and

engagement—must be

constantly considered

and reconsidered,

balanced and rebal-

anced.

There is no zero-