Page 32 - FSJ - 070812

This is a SEO version of FSJ - 070812. Click here to view full version

« Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page »
F
OCUS ON
FSI /FS T
RA INING
A
T
FSI’
S
H
ELM
: A
N
I
NTERVIEW
WITH
R
UTH
A. W
HITESIDE
32
F O R E I G N S E R V I C E J O U R N A L / J U LY - A U G U S T 2 0 1 2
ditor’s Note: Reporter
Shawn Zeller interviewed Foreign Service Institute Di-
rector Ruth A. Whiteside and Deputy Director Tracey Ja-
cobson on April 24.
SZ:
What did you think of the 2011 American Acad-
emy of Diplomacy/Stimson Center report that laid out
the case for expanding State Department training?
RW:
We spent a great deal of time with the folks who
did the study. A lot of the issues they raised were more
appropriate for the Foreign Service director general and
the Bureau of Human Resources to decide.
Part of what they were trying to get at, which is very
valuable for the department, was really to build the case
for a very robust training float. If you have a very robust
training float — the military has 15 percent more soldiers
than they have jobs, so they can constantly have people in
training — you can take people out of the system at var-
ious points and give them a year of training. But they
also recognized that’s not the world we live in.
The ability of HR to staff all our current positions,
until we’ve grown more than we’ve grown, doesn’t fit into
the notion that you can take an FS-2 or FS-3 out of the
system for a year in that military way. The case they were
really making was the case for resources. The longer-
term issue of how you would reshape the entire Service
— not just training, but assignments, details and other
interagency experiences — depends on our ability to cre-
ate a personnel “float” that would allow for all of that.
SZ: S
o they weren’t criticizing the quality of training.
They were just saying Foreign Service employees need
more of it, right?
RW:
I don’t know anybody who disagrees with that.
Certainly not us. But until you have resources to sustain
that, our focus is making the training that we do as valu-
able as it can possibly be.
SZ:
Still, people are already getting more training,
right?
RW:
Absolutely. Under Diplomacy 3.0, the most re-
cent hiring initiative, the Foreign Service has grown by 17
percent and the Civil Service by 10 percent, so that’s def-
initely one factor. The other factor has been an interest
in training, a willingness to send people to training, giv-
ing entry-level officers and others more training than we
would have some years ago. It’s a combination of in-
T
HE DIRECTOR OF THE
F
OREIGN
S
ERVICE
I
NSTITUTE
REFLECTS ON THE TRAINING CENTER
S EXPANDING ROLE
.
B
Y
S
HAWN
Z
ELLER
Shawn Zeller, a regular contributor to the
Journal
, is a free-
lance writer in Washington, D.C.